"Zoning For Trees"
Prof.
Buck Abbey, ASLA, CELA
© all rights reserved
Zoning and Building
Codes
Planners and zoning commissions
have a great responsibility for preserving trees in the city.
Zoning
ordinances and building codes are the two principle tools for building
communities. Architects, engineers and interior designers have designed with life
safety codes for many years. Landscape Architects have not. The building codes set forth design
standards, commonly accepted construction practices and agency requirements
that must be met for all types of construction. The building in building
codes makes reference to the practice of building or construction and not just
habitable structures referred to by laymen as buildings. Therefore building
codes are about sound efficient construction and not various types of buildings
used to house society. Standard building codes, where most life safety issues are
found, do not pertain to site development, land clearing, tree preservation,
water conservation, site storm water management or landscaping construction.
This is largely the reason that landscape architects have not been designing to
code until recently. Building codes do not provide regulations for sensitive
site development or redevelopment.
Landscape and tree codes do that.
Building codes
are closely related to community zoning laws and are often found within the
same set of municipal ordinances but they are not the same. Zoning, as every
planner will attest is more about how buildings are sited, how land use is
allocated and how public health is maintained.. Building codes and zoning
result in the built city as we see it today. Except for trees, vegetation and
the natural elements of a building site or community.
What about the
natural elements of a building site? Where are regulations found that protect
and preserve trees and other sensitive site features? The answer of course is within community
landscape and tree regulations? In the
last four decades these ordinances are finding their way into community zoning
laws primarily because the building codes do not understand them or accept
them. Therefore planners, planning and zoning officials and design consultants
must be knowledgeable about green laws that protect, preserve and rebuild
nature in the city. Zoning is the tool to keep nature in the city.
Designers are
required to see that construction plans are in compliance with standard building
codes and contractors must build accordingly. Planners must see that
construction plans are in compliance with all zoning requirements including
requirements for tree preservation, tree protection, tree planting, landscaping
and the design of vegetative plantings on zoned building sites.
Only since the
1970s have landscape regulations come into existence in communities across the
nation as a method of making up for the oversight of nature in the standard
building code. Landscape codes contained within municipal zoning ordinances
regulate site development though the police power of zoning.
Trees are
becoming an important aspect of zoning and planners need to understand how
trees are an additional site zoning concern that complements setback, bulk, height
and land use. Planners need to know how to properly craft zoning regulations to
maintain nature in the city.
Nature In The
City
Trees in the city are natures great symbol of community
health. A green community is a clean community.
A community
with trees is a healthy community. The World Health Organization lists eleven
characteristics of a healthy community. One of their characteristics of a
healthy community is an ecosystem that is stable in the present and sustainable
in the long run and will lead to a clean, safe physical environment of high
quality. Treed communities are healthy
when natural systems are present and functioning. The literature suggests that
nature in the city will enhance biodiversity, reduce atmospheric carbon,
improve water quality, filter the air and reduce toxic chemicals in the
environment. A community that is zoned
for tress will allow vegetation to clean the air, cool the climate and purify
the water. Healthy communities are beautiful, supportive of wildlife and
environmentally efficient. That is the energy of the sun and its ability to
generate biomass is in equilibrium with forces of nature or mankind that work
to destroy nature. Sustainability is the measure of a healthy city and trees do
their part in keeping a community healthy. A city without trees is not as
healthy primarily because the actions of mankind to develop urban land remove
or alter the natural systems that sustain life. Air purity may be the best
example to understand. Trees absorb carbon, urban pollution and other trace
elements that are essentially harmful to human health and animal and crop
production while at the same time producing oxygen, atmospheric humidity and
shade through the process of photosynthesis, absorption and evapotranpiration
that are essential biological functions of trees. Everyone would agree that a village is
healthier than a town, a town is healthier than a city and a city if be far a
more healthy place than a mega-city. The more paved a city becomes; the less
opportunity there is for natures systems of soils, water, atmosphere,
vegetation, animal life and climate to work for mankind. And as a bonus, a
healthy city is tranquil, relaxing and refreshing to the human spirit by simply
adding beauty to the surroundings.
Zoning is the
tool created to ensure community health and to allow for more livable places.
Trees bestow upon towns and cities social, environmental and economic benefits
that make the community a fit place to live. Trees and other vegetation filter
pollutants from air, provide shade for homes, buildings and parking lots and
cleans contaminates from storm water. Trees and preserved habitats within a
community such as a forested wetlands or stream bank buffers can detain storm
water runoff, reduce flooding and abate the erosion of productive nutrient rich
soils. Maintained woodlands within cities provide habitat for animals and
create desirable living and working places for citizens. Plantings increase property
value, attract shoppers to businesses and provide relief from summer sun and
tropical storms. The simple act of
planting a tree will decrease cooling costs for any building and the cost
savings will far outweigh the original cost of the planting. Trees provide many
benefits useful to society other than beauty.
But perhaps
the most important thing that happens when communities preserve there natural
forests, meadows, wetlands, streams, marshes, bogs and trees, is that citizens
of the community have a greater ecological consciousness. With a better
understanding of the importance of nature in the city, urban dwellers will do
their part to keep the city clean and healthy.
Communities
who manage their urban forests and preserve nature in the city do so through
zoning. To keep a city healthy, it must be zoned to preserve trees and other
vegetation and maintain an appropriate percentage of undeveloped land in which
nature is allowed to fully function. Zoning of sensitive lands, lands
containing many trees, is something that cities should do, and have the
authority to do.
Planning
commissioners and professional planners ensure that nature in the city is cared
for by enacting comprehensive landscape codes that specifies minimum standards
for the preservation of nature in the city. This is done especially in regard
to trees and other landscape plants which are natures most visible symbol
within the city. To maintain trees in a
community it is important to have site development regulations that control or
encourage land clearing, habitat preservation, tree protection, water
conservation and on-site storm water management. In recent years, city after city across the
nation have turned to this type or local regulatory action as a means of
ensuring better site design and acceptable community design standards.
To preserve
nature in the city tree regulations must be contained within a communitys
zoning ordinance. Therefore, zoning for trees can be seen as basic zoning
criterion. Zoning for trees and places on building sites in which they may grow
can complement the traditional zoning prerogatives of setback, bulk, height,
land use intensity, buffering and parking which are the primary components of
modern day zoning systems.
The case for
zoning for trees was certified in 1949 in the famous Ayres v City Council of
Los Angeles. In the Ayres case a subdivision developer was required by the
planning commission to provide a planted buffer near the intersection of
Zoning for
trees may be referred to as green laws, a sobriquet for regulations that
support or promote nature in the city. Green laws are generally of three types.
They include landscape regulations, tree ordinances or comprehensive land
development codes. All three maintain nature and promote the protection,
preservation and planting of trees as an essential element of any communitys
infrastructure.
Green Laws
Landscape regulations, often referred to as landscape codes
essentially have been written to preserve locations on building site where
trees and vegetation are allowed to grow. This form of green law typically
provide for the design and planting of such site facilities as street yards,
parking lots, site service areas, landscape buffers, visual screens, irrigation
hydrozones, visual screens, and design of yard plantings that serve a variety
of uses. They may also be habitat preservation areas that preserve wetlands,
stream bank buffers, forest floors, waterfront yards or old landmark trees.
These plantable areas are essential elements of any building site for which
zoning regulations can be established. Plantable areas of a building site occur
in predictable locations as can be seen in Fig. 1.0. They
are often referred to as landscape design components, or design components and
collectively they can be called the essential geography of the development
site..1. Fig. 2.0 set forth
some of the more common design components contained within landscape codes and
each component provides a recognizable and consistent planting location on a
building site, be it a lot, tract or neighborhood. Without sufficient planting
sites, trees can not be planted.
_________________ ______________________
_________________________
Designation
..Location
..Purpose
..
Street
Tree Planting Area Along
Street ROW Public
Tree Plantings
Street
Yard Between
Building and Street Beautify
Street
Street
Wall Adjacent
To
Foundation
Wall Between
A Building And A VUA Improve
Pedestrian Areas
Vehicular
Use Area Interior
VUA
Screen Between
Cars And Conflicting Land Use Screening
Vehicles From View
Side
Yard Buffer Buffering
Conflicting Land Use At Side Screening
Neighbors
Rear
Yard Buffer Buffering
Conflicting Land Use At Rear Screening
Neighbors
Habitat
Preservation Area Preserved
Wetland, Tree Grove or Forest Protecting
Irrigation
Hydrozones Site
Irrigation Conservation Zones Reduce
Waste Of Water
Stream
Bank Buffer Between
Development and Streams Filters
Storm Water
_________________ ______________________
_________________________
Fig. 3.0 Geography of a Development Site
The total of
all plantable areas, often called permeable areas comprise the open space
system of any building site. The open space in square footage divided by the
total site area provides the open space ratio of a building site. The higher
the open space ration of a building site the better. Open space ratios in excess of fifty percent
can be considered excellent. An open space ratio of thirty percent is
considered good while an open space ratio less than ten percent is poor.
But landscape
codes also provide standards for the design and planting of trees, tree
species diversification, tree preservation and tree protection. Communities by zoning for trees are also
creating standards to protect tree canopy, provide for shade, detain storm
water run off, abate erosion, and cool hot urban environments. Trees in the
city provide many services and are an important part of any building site.
In most
communities, the reason for a landscape code is the protection of the public
health, safety and welfare by placing regulation on lot compatibility, damages
to natural systems, water use conservation, and on site storm water management.
Some of the better codes, Mandeville, Louisiana for instance, encourage habitat
preservation as a storm water management strategy so that their so called
preserved Greenbelts not only save trees but screen neighbors, add to the
beauty of the community and filter and manage storm water. .2.
Other code regulations place obligations on those that provide landscape
design, grounds maintenance, arboriculture or landscape construction services.
Still other landscape codes place a emphasis on tree protection during
construction and proper methods of planting.
Landscape
regulations are among the fastest growing aspects of zoning. Only dating back
to the late 1960s when the first landscape regulations were first written in
South Carolina and Florida, they are now rapidly being adopted as zoning law in
almost every city larger than fifty thousand inhabitants.
Tree ordinances, the oldest of the green laws, dating back to
the 1930s are often stand alone community regulations that are part of the
municipal code but not part of the zoning ordinance. Not being included within
zoning makes these green laws not very effective in maintaining nature in the
city simply because they do not carry the police power of zoning but only the
will of the community to enforce them from the general code book. More often
than not, they apply only to trees on public land and are not very
comprehensive. Tree management ordinances advocated by such organizations as
the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) set standards for the care of
trees in American cities and towns. Many tree laws regulate the practice of
arboriculture and set up municipal urban forestry programs, establish tree
boards and institute licensing for arborist. .3. One recent study of tree
ordinances from California points out that this type of ordinance is focused
entirely on single trees and their management. These ordinances fail to recognize
the importance of native habitat protection, design or site development
opportunities for trees..4.
To
many tree ordinances deal with issues of jurisdiction, tree policy, citizen
assistance, licensing arborists, tree abuse and street trees and fail to
recognize the relationship between zoning and trees.
Tree ordinances are usually one of three main
types. They are tree preservation
ordinances created to protect trees. The most common form is street tree
ordinances that regulate and protect and assist in the maintenance of trees on
public lands along streets. And the least common are development tree
ordinances. The later are generally known as landscaping ordinances because
they affect total site landscaping as well as trees. Planting standards are not
very sophisticated and they are seldom tailored to specific parts of a zoned
development site. This form of tree ordinance does not stress design as much as
it does tree planting. A variant found
in some communities is called a view ordinance. This type of tree ordinance is created to
remove conflicts between property owners when trees block views or sunlight. .5 . This concern is so important in Santa
Monica, California for instance that tree plantings and hedges are completely
controlled from blocking views to the sea and the mountains by city
administrators. Planting a hedge of grove of trees is highly restricted by
zoning in some communities.
The better
tree ordinances however are contained within landscape codes, not separate from
them. Tree regulations should be harmonized into landscape codes and must be
related to site development, zoning and design. When tree ordinances are
isolated from zoning, they are focused only on trees, and not how trees fit in
with development or how the may promote community health, safety and welfare.
From a recent
study of community tree ordinances it is clear that most contemporary tree
ordinances have been written to protect and preserve trees rather than to
support the needs of zoning, land use, development or design. A study of tree
laws was conducted for the purpose of writing this paper. The study compared
tree ordinances promoted by the USDA Forest Service to selected ordinances from
other communities. The Forest Service Tree Ordinance Index is thought to be
representative of typical tree ordinances found in American Communities..6. A total of fifty community tree laws were
studied for the purposes of defining the essential provisions of a well written
tree law. No attempt was made to rank them, classify them by type or to
determine if the ordinances were contained with a city Municipal Code or Zoning
Ordinance. Some of the ordinances were applied to public land, some to private
and a few were actually model codes promulgated by agencies, universities or researchers.
The study even included a model code from the LSU Green Law Research Project
that was written several years ago and adopted in several communities around
the country. As a result of this work, Fig 3.0 below illustrates
the most common regulations found in municipal tree ordinances.
_________________ ______________________
_________________________
Code
Provision
..Purpose
.
..
CONTEXTUAL
Short title Ordinance
title and location within the municipal code
Policies Regarding Trees General policy toward
preservation, .protection, plantings and
tree care
Tree Care License Licenses,
qualifications, fees
Definitions Technical
definitions concerning the code
Purpose And Intent/Applicability Specific purpose of
the tree ordinance
TECHNICAL
Tree
Inventory/Tree Survey Tree
Inventory and Analysis
Tree Disposal Requirements
for disposal of vegetation
Hazardous/Diseased
Trees Definition
of hazardous trees
Tree
Protection/Protective Fencing Tree
protection during construction
Tree
Preservation Credits Incentives
toward preserving trees
Pruning/Planting
Standards Technical
operations toward trees
Tree Care
Specifications Arboricultural
operations
Tree Planting Tree
planting operations
Tree Species Botanical
and horticultural operations
Landmark
/Heritage Trees Special
tree protection and preservation
Planting Yards Required
planting locations on development sites
Landscape And
Tree Plans Tree
plantings plans and specifications
Tree Protection
Areas Preserved
habitats for trees
Canopy
Requirements Standards
for replanting of trees
Landscape
Requirements Standards
for other plantings on development sites
Street And Park
Trees Special
requirements for public tree care
Public/Private
Trees Policy
toward public and private trees
ADMINISTRATIVE
Submittal of
Plans Procedures
for submitting review documents
Permits Required permits
for tree removal/planting/pruning/disposal
Duties of Urban Forestry/Arborist Administrative staff responsibility
Duties of the Administrator Administrative staff
responsibility/procedures
Tree Advisory Board Citizen
Oversight/Advisory Tree and Landscape
Commission
Enforcement & Penalty Corrective Mechanisms
Hearings and Appeals Public
Notice and Due Process Proceedings
Emergency Waiver Requirements
concerning trees under special conditions
Severability/Repealer
Effective Date
_________________ ______________________
_________________________
Fig. 3.0 Common Tree Ordinance Provisions
Planners who
want to draft a community tree ordinance would do well to include most of the
contextual, technical and administrative standards listed above.
Few of the
tree ordinances studied deal with zoning issues. All of these examples deal singularly with
tree care in one form or the other. Some of the better ordinances in this study
regulate tree preservation and planting as well, and this is a positive step
for tree ordinances to take. Some of the better tree ordinances are seen in Fig 4.0 below. The contemporary history of tree ordinances
can be seen by reviewing the fifty (50) ordinances in this study. There is a
trend in the way the ordinances have being written. The earliest ordinance, the Municipal Tree Manual-Standard Municipal
Ordinance dates to the 1950s and clearly shows that the first ordinances
were written to support the development of the arborist industry. This MTM
ordinance, as it is called, and those that followed in the 60s and 70s did
this by establishing municipal forestry programs, developing shade tree commissions
and hiring municipal arborists. The
California Guidelines Model, one of the most contemporary of the featured
ordinances, although broader in some respects, still puts forward the basic
format of the 1950s ordinance design. Some of the contemporary ordinances such
as Charlotte, Palo Alto and Gwinnett County
and Baton Rouge are moving away from
this trend and provide regulation for tree preservation and replanting.
__________________ ______________________
________________________
..
..
........................Community
Title
.
Austin, Texas- Ordinance 960328-B
Boca Raton, Florida- Article II
Trees
Baton Rouge, Louisiana- UDC
Chapter 18 Landscape And Trees
Charlotte North Carolina- Chapter
21, Trees
Georgia Forestry Commission-
Framework Ordinance
Gwinnett County, Georgia-Tree
Ordinance
Howard County, Maryland- Subtitle
12 Forest Conservation
Miami-Dade, Florida- Tree
Protection Ordinance
Palo Alto, California- Chapter
18-10 Tree Preservation
Raleigh North Carolina- Chapter 8
Trees And Vegetation
Santa Cruz, California- Chapter
9.56 Preservation of Historic Trees
Southlake, Texas- Ordinance 585-B
Tree Preservation Ordinance
__________________ ______________________
________________________
Fig. 4.0 Selected Tree Ordinances, LSU Tree
Ordinance Index
The Howard County, Santa Cruz and Southlake
ordinances are very good contemporary ordinances that are expanding the
definition of what a tree ordinance can be. In the case of Howard it is forest preservation, with Cruz it is preservation and protection of old trees and with Southlake it is enforcement and
integration with the community landscape code. The LSU Tree Ordinance Index is well worth studying by any planning
commission wishing to write a tree ordinance from scratch.
It is common for tree ordinances to not
address zoning, development or design.
All are measures, strongly related to the development and management of
the urban forest. Some of the contemporary ordinances from this study such as Collier County, Florida, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Coral Spring,
Florida and Lexington, Kentucky,
while not making the LSU Index are becoming better integrated with landscape
codes that have become part of municipal zoning regulation since tree
ordinances came into popular use in the 1960s.
While many communities
enact ordinances merely for beauty or economic development, there are other
important reasons why these codes are written.
In recent years Davis, California
enacted a landscape ordinance for solar control, particularly in regards to
parking lots. Near by Irvine, California, enacted an ordinance
to promote sustainability which is a form or recycling natural resources and
energy. Santa Monica, California in
Los Angeles county, is known as the sustainable city and recovers all rain
that falls that on the city to recapture pollutants before they find their way
into Santa Monica bay. They use planting areas on building sites to soak up
storm water to minimize run off .
Many communities in Florida, such as Lake Mary and St. Lucie County, base their ordinances on the need to conserve and reuse irrigation water. Collier County on the west coast and Volusia County on the east coast of Florida both require on-site storm water management and have standards that call for storm water facilities. Some of the new Georgia codes are directed toward sustaining tree canopy and preventing soil erosion. These codes call for a certain density of trees on all development sites. Texas codes are being written to include more shade within vehicular use areas. Austin recently drafted new language that will make parking lots cooler. Louisiana is exploring on-site storm water management and green parking lot design. Too much water is a problem in Louisiana so the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality is working on a model landscape code that will help clean the states coastal waters. Maryland and Virginia have recognized the same problem for over a decade so many of their local codes call for forest preservation. Carolinas codes are being written to provide for stated numbers of trees per acre. These codes are concerned with canopy standards, shade requirements and tree preservation.
Tree Ordinance by
Design
There are new directions that tree laws might take that will bring them more in line with zoning theory and put the power of police zoning to work preserving nature in the city. There are several directions or messages that that might be considered.
Tree ordinances and landscape codes, both working to preserve, protect and replant nature in the city need to be combined rather than competitive or overlapping. This is a problem. The two types of green laws do not work together in many communities. The Chapel Hill Ordinance, is a good example of how tree ordinances need to be designed to be integrated in their approach to preserving nature on a building site. Chapel Hills ordinance for example is based upon integrating the tree and landscape code into the zoning ordinance in the form of site design standards. These standards including regulations for critical areas, habitat preservation (especially of significant stands), tree care, tree protection, landscaping, screening, buffering, parking lot design, open space, integrated management practices, lighting, storm water management and erosion/sedimentation control. They are all integrated into the zoning code so they become tangible elements of any building program from the very beginning.
This code utilizes a more low impact development (LID) approach to tree issues and is much more integrated in concept.
Contemporary tree ordinances need to be harmonized or woven together to be part of the same body of municipal law. An examination of tree law vocabulary as seen in Appendix A gives evidence of the need for integration. All green laws need to be contained with zoning laws and must emanate from land use and not be just part of a communitys general body of law that dictates land use from outside the zoning code. In other words, green laws need to enhance zoning, not just put limits on land development which is what many tree laws do.
One community in Texas for instance contacted the University recently to say they needed help in drafting a tree law. When asked if they had a zoning ordinance to place the law within context, they demurred. This little community does not have zoning so their tree law would not have the backing authority of zoning, and hence could not be properly enforced. This tree law will dictate rather than enhance zoning and land development.. One further observation is worthy of note. The majority of municipal tree law pertains to trees on public land or simply street trees and do not even approach the zoning code! This form of tree law that is very common pertains to tree care, primarily pruning, shaping, removals and treatment for insects, disease and systemic problems. Now this is important but do you see the point?
The second message is that tree laws need to be more concerned with root space rather than canopy area.
Many newer tree laws that focus on tree density are based upon canopy standards, drip line calculations or shadow pattern and not available planting area. To get root space, areas of building sites need to be set aside for planting or tree preservation. The Fulton Country, Georgia ordinance is a case in point.
The purpose of Fulton
is to cultivate and encourage a high level of tree preservation through
administrative guidelines rather than implemented regulations within the zoning
ordinance. The code is
designed to provide standards for the preservation of trees as part of the land
development, building construction and timber harvest processes. It is not the
intent of this ordinance to regulate individual properties that must follow the
rules of zoning. The requirements kick in only when activities require a land
disturbance permit, a building permit or timber harvest permit. Zoning has
nothing to do with this ordinance so every action is voluntary. Certain
benefits are cited to the citizens of Fulton County. They point out that
preserving trees will control soil erosion, moderate of storm water runoff,
improve water quality, intercept airborne particulate matter
and the reduce air pollutant loads.
Enhanced to wildlife habitat is also mentioned as are the reduction of
noise and glare, climate moderation, aesthetics, scenic quality and increased
property value. No mention is made of zoning or how the tree preservation
ordinance increases the communitys ability to zone effectively for trees or
even land use, bulk, height, set back, screening and buffering..7.
A third message is the arborists meditation on the single lone specimen tree. This might be a tree found standing by itself in a parking lot, along a road way, in park or on someones lawn. A tree standing tall and free in all of its naked glory. A tree with a significant straight bole, prominent central leaders and delicate branching that waife irascible leaves, all basking in the warmth of full sunlight and bearing a perfect east-west orientation. Trees in nature do not grow like this. Writers, crafters and designers of tree laws should be at least equally concerned with conserving habitat and a mixture of vegetation and its dependent wildlife rather than just preserving specimen trees to be pruned and maintained on a regular basis by those in the aboricultural industry. Nature in the city needs to be in its natural configuration as much as practical. Irregular meadows with substantial tree groves, treed forest edges, wetlands, stream banks, marshes, recharge areas wildlife habitat and general open spaces provide places for trees to grow in the urban forest. Habitat preservation should be a prime goal of most tree laws, specimen tree preservation a secondary goal. Better tree laws can be written to protect existing treed areas or to replant natural forests in places where development has changed conditions. Rebuilding the urban forest by moving the forest around development is easier to do than preserving trees within development areas. This might be a tree policy worth pursuing
Fourthly, the USDA Forest Service recently released a study concerning the size of trees within the urban forest. This so called large tree argument indicates that large-stature trees are better within the city than small trees. Simply because the benefits of trees are multiplied as the tree grows bigger. When it comes to trees, size, they claim, really does matter. The authors of this philosophy argue that increased benefits in regard to trees result in reduction in storm water run off; improvement in local air, soil and water quality; reductions in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Further they point out big trees provide more wildlife habitat; increase property values and enhance the attractiveness of a community..8. They make a strong case for big trees with their position that large trees are what urban forests need but this is a faulty argument in light of zoning practices.
Large trees only is a mono-culturists thinking, not indifferent from the way Indiana corn farmers think about their rural landscape. In the city, a variety of planting spaces exist and various growing conditions result from land development activities largely as a result of zoning.. It is better to use trees and other landscape materials of different sizes, textures and character and then layer them into tree groves within available planting spaces. From a wildlife habitat point of view this is certainly more beneficial Again, the argument for large trees or small trees fails to think about zoning and land development issues but concentrates on saving the perfect tree. Many of which may not be perfect.
Finally, even contemporary tree laws and recommendations for their drafting fail to recognize the importance of harmonized codes and codes based upon zoning, site development and design. Single issue landscape codes that deal only with trees fail to see new trends that are developing in community design, These new trends, on-site storm water management, green parking, low impact development, smart growth and new urbanism may completely undo the way we presently think about writing tree ordinances. They will offer new possibilities for writing creative harmonized tree ordinances and will be much different in message than the MTM ordinance mentioned previously which is the foundation to most of the history of contemporary tree laws in this country..9.
The best way to insure that trees are seen as green infrastructure is to make sure that tree laws recognize design and are contained within, (harmonized) with landscape codes and landscape regulations both of which are codified within community zoning laws. This will not be an easy task but the trend has started. Communities such as Baton Rouge, LA; Collier County, FL; Columbia, S.C; Fairfax County, VA; Greensboro, N.C.; Gwinnette County, GA; Howard County, MD; Lexington, S.C.; Orlando, FL; and Marco Island, Florida have enacted some comprehensive green laws that see trees as an important element of zoning that have implications for environment, conservation, storm water management, open space and civic design. This is a positive trend for the future for tree laws.
How to
harmonize community landscape codes tree ordinances? The answer is complex but
we know for sure that it will be the role of planning officials, landscape
administrators and staff to make it happen. .10.
Code Administration
As more and
more cities enact integrated landscape codes that incorporate tree
preservation, habitat protection and storm water management regulations code
administrators and planners will need to improve their knowledge of plant
materials, habitat protection, urban planting technology, irrigation, storm
water and design issues. Perhaps, even
more importantly, planners who work as code administrators, many will need to go
through vigorous on the job training to learn how to interpret landscape plans,
tree preservation plans, landscape construction drawings, tree surveys, design
details and written landscape specifications that will be submitted for
permits. Planners will need to understand how to write, review and make needed
improvements to the landscape code they will be called upon to draft, revise or
administrator.
The job of a landscape code administrator who will be in charge of tree zoning compliance is very complex. This is largely due to the many things a code administrator must know and the various duties that are assigned to a person in this position, as seen in Fig. no. 5.0 below. Planners who do this type of work must possess some understanding of landscape architecture, horticulture, urban arboriculture, urban natural systems and basic site engineering. To protect nature in the city, the code administrator must be responsible for plan review, site inspection, issuing permits and working with developers, builders, arborists and designers. They may need to be able to organize a tree bank program, operate a community tree nursery and understand how to read tree surveys and tree planting plans. This is an important job, planners must rise to the occasion if nature in the city is to be part of our urban fabric.
_________________ ______________________
_________________________
The Many Duties Of A Landscape Administrator
.
..
Advise community leaders and the general public on matters of nature
Organize a local tree/landscape advisory commission
Write and amend local zoning laws to include landscape & tree zoning
Write standard specifications for tree care, and plant material installation
Provide assistance to other units of local government in regard to trees
Work closely with the city landscape architect or arborist
Work with private developers, architects, engineers, landscape architects
Review preliminary landscape plans
Review Tree Surveys & Tree Protection Plans
Review and approve final landscape plans and specifications
Write reports and issue permits
Conduct field inspections
Manage Community Street Tree and Open Space Plans
Complete continuing education or on the job training on technical topics
Manage staff & budget
_________________ ______________________
_________________________
Fig. 5.0 Landscape Code Administrator Duties
It
might be argued that landscape code administration will be one of the greatest
employment growth areas for planners, arborists, landscape architects, urban
foresters and horticulturists in the coming years as more and more cities write
landscape codes to manage the green infrastructure of the community.
Evolving
landscape codes are causing the work of code administrators, to change, and
change rapidly. As natures agent, if landscape administrators are to protect
nature in the city, they must undertake continuous training to keep up with
changes in zoning law, landscape codes, tree management science and urban
design. It will not be easy, but it will be worth it if we can keep nature in
the city by zoning for trees.
Appendix A-Standard Tree Ordinance Vocabulary
___________________________________________________________
Arboricultural Treatments. Arboricultural
treatments" means all services, treatments or operations involving
trimming, pruning, spraying, injecting, fertilizing, cabling, surgery work,
removal of and cutting above or below ground level of a tree.
.
..
.Missoula, Montana
Arborist, Certified. One who is well-versed in the art of
arboriculture, including tree surgery, the prevention and cure of tree
diseases, and the control of insects, and who has International Society of
Arboriculture (ISA) Arborist Certification
...
Miami-Dade,
Florida
Buffering. The use of
landscaping along with berms, walls or decorative fences that at least
partially and periodically obstruct the view from the street........Austin,
Texas.
Caliper Means the minimum trunk diameter of a
replacement tree as measured at a predetermined point of measurement. Trunk diameter
for trees up to four inches is to be measured six inches above the soil line.
All trees over four inches in diameter will be measured 12 inches above the
soil line.
..
..Volusia County, Florida
Canopy Cover. Means the area above
ground which is covered by the trunk and branches of the tree
Tigard, Oregon
Critial Root
Zone,CRZ, The area of tree roots
within the crown dripline, this is generally defined as a circle with a radius
extending from the tree trunk to a point no less than the farthest crown
dripline
.
...Columbia, South Carolina.
Crownspread. Means
the distance from the ends of the branches on one side of the tree, through the
trunk, to the ends of the branches on the outermost branches on the other
side
..Germantown, Tennessee
DBH. Refers to diameter at breast height which means
the diameter of the trunk, at its maximum cross section, measured 54 inches (4
1/2 feet) above mean ground level at the base of the trunk..
Ashland, Oregon
Density
Factor For The Site, DFS. A unit of measure to
prescribe and calculate required tree coverage on a site based upon tree
size
..Columbia, South Carolina
Dripline Area. Means the area within X distance from the
perimeter of the trunk of the tree at four and one-half feet above natural
grade where X equals a distance ten times the diameter of the truck as measured
four and one-half feet above natural grade
.
.Palo Alto,
California
Impervious
Surface Percentage. An site intensity measurement of the
impervious surface of a building site.
.....................................................West Lafayette, Indiana.
Habitat
Preservation Area, HPA. An area
of a site in which the entire natural habitat is unchanged and protected for
the preservation of trees, storm water infiltration or wildlife.
.
Louisiana State University
Hatracking. The flat cutting of the top of a tree,
severing the leader or leaders, or the removal of any branch three inches or
greater in diameter at any point other than the branch collar, i.e., that point
where the lateral branches meet the main trunk
..
..
.Miami-Dade, Florida
Hazard or
Hazardous. Means a tree or part of a tree that has a high potential for
failure and falling on a nearby object because of dead or dying branches, roots
or trunk
Passadena, California
Heritage
and Specimen Planting. Shall mean any tree, grove, shrub, hedge or
other planting which is determined to have special significance to the
community
.
..Milpitas, California
Land
Altering Activity. Any change to existing land which would
physically alter the existing conditions and vegetative cover on the
land.......Shreveport, Louisiana.
Landmark Trees. Tree or trees as defined on a list of trees
enunciated and established by the Bedford Town Board, with such list being
filed in the office of the Bedford Town Clerk.
Net Lot
Area. The area within lot
boundaries of all lands comprising the building
site.........................................................................................Dade
County, Florida.
Opacity. An imaginary
vertical plane extending from the established grade to a required height of
which a required percent of the vertical plane shall be visually screened from
adjacent property use....
......Dublin, Ohio.
Percent
Minimum Canopy. The amount of existing tree canopy an
Applicant must preserve based on the zoning designation of the land to be
developed
.Fayetteville, Arkansas
Perimeter
Landscape Strip. Is a landscaped area which separates the
vehicular use area from adjoining property and/or public
right-of-way..........Little Rock, Arkansas.
Plantable
Area: The pervious surface area
expressed in square footage available for the preservation or planting of
vegetation.....................................Alpharetta, Georgia.
Prohibited Tree Species. Those tree species that are detrimental to
native plants, native wildlife, ecosystems, human health and/or safety and
welfare. This article incorporates by
reference the Miami-Dade County Landscape Manual listing of prohibited
species
.Miami-Dade, Florida
Protected
Tree. All mangrove trees and
cypress trees, regardless of diameter, shall be defined as protected
trees
...Tampa, Florida
Protective Barrier means a
physical structure limiting access to a protected tree, composed of wood or
other suitable materials, which ensures compliance with the
intent of this article
.
.Biloxi,
Mississippi
.
Public Trees. shall include all shade and ornamental trees or shrubs now or
hereafter growing on any street, park or public place
.
.Portland,
Maine
Reforestation. Means the establishment, in accordance with
the Howard County Forest Conservation Manual, of new forest cover to replace
forest resources lost because of development activities
...
Howard
County, Maryland.
Riparian Buffer. A biological community consisting of trees, woody
shrubs and groundcover that exists along the banks of rivers, creeks or
intermittent and perennial streams
.
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Significant Tree. Significant
tree shall be any tree that is at least six (6) inches in
D.B.H
...
.Lynnwood,
Washington
Street Trees.
Street trees are herein defined as trees, shrubs, bushes,
and all other woody vegetation on land lying between property lines on either
side of all streets, avenues, or ways within the City
...
..Municipal Tree
Manual (MTM)
Street
Yard. The street yard is the area of a lot which
lies between the street right-of-way line and the actual front wall line of the
building............
.....Austin, Texas.
Topping.
Topping is defined as the severe cutting back of tree limbs to stubs larger
than three (3) inches in diameter within the tree's crown to such a degree so
as to remove the normal canopy and disfigure the tree
.Georgia Framework
Ordinance
Tree And
Landscape Commission. Shall consist of nine (9) voting members
and several non-voting ex-officio members who shall be
appointed by the Mayor-President with the approval of the Metropolitan Council
and whose duties shall be to study of problems involving the City-Parishs
urban forest, determine needs, compose and annually review a City-Parish Urban
Forestry Management Plan, and seek ways to implement needed work
..Baton
Rouge, Louisiana
Tree Bank. A tree bank fund is established by the City to
provide an
opportunity to make a cash payment to the City in lieu
of providing required
landscape material.
..Altamonte Springs,
Florida.
Tree-Class
A. Any self supporting woody plant of a species
which normally grows to an overall height of at least fifty (50)
feet.
......Covington, Louisiana.
Tree-Class
B. Any self supporting woody plant of a species
which normally grows to an overall height between thirty (30) and
fifty (50) feet
......Covington, Louisiana.
Tree-Class
C. Any self supporting small tree or large shrub
of a species which normally grows to an overall height between fifteen (15) and
thirty (30) feet
......Covington,
Louisiana.
Tree
Conservation Area, TCA. A Tree Conservation Area is one or more areas of a site which includes
existing trees and their critical root zones. The purpose of the TCA is to
encourage the preservation of healthy trees that are four (4) inches or greater
in diameter at breast height
.
.Greensboro, North, Carolina
Tree
Cover Requirements. All
developments requiring submission and approval of a site plan shall include the
preservation and planting of trees on the site to the extent that, at maturity
of ten years, minimum tree cover s(10-20% of site) shall be
provided
..
..Fairfax, County, Virginia
Tree
Density Unit (TDU). A credit assigned to a tree, based on the
diameter of the tree, in accordance with tables contained in this
ordinance
.
Gwinnett County, Georgia.
Tree
Density Standard (TDS) : The
minimum number of Tree Density Units per acre which must be achieved on a
property after development.....Gwinnett County, Georgia.
Tree Permit .
Consent given in writing by the
Urban Forester to a person ,
firm or agency to alter or
remove any tree or to do anything that would affect that City -owned or controlled tree, including
cutting or filling the soil around the roots, or allowing any toxic pollutant
to injure the tree
.
.Raleigh, North Carolina
Tree
Preservation and/or Replacement Plan. A plan that identifies Tree Protection Areas
where existing trees are to be preserved and where proposed replacement trees
are to be planted on a property to meet minimum requirements, as well as
methods of tree protection to be undertaken on the site and other pertinent
information.
...
......Gwinnett County, Georgia.
Tree
Protection Area (TPA) : Any
portion of a site wherein are located existing trees which are proposed to be
preserved
.....Gwinnett County, Georgia.
Tree removal. means removal of a tree(s) or vegetation, through either direct or
indirect actions including, but not limited to, clearing, topping or cutting,
causing irreversible damage to roots or trunks; poisoning; destroying the
structural integrity; and/or any filling, excavation, grading, or trenching in
the drip line area of a tree which has the potential to cause irreversible
damage to the tree, or relocation of an existing tree to a new planting
location.
.Seattle, Washington
Tree
Survey. A plan drawing that
provides legend details about the location
and details of trees. and contains the information set
forth in Schedule B hereto.
.
Southlake, Texas
Tree Technical Manual. Means the regulations issued by the city manager to
implement this chapter
...
Palo Alto, California
Vehicular
Use Areas. All areas subject to vehicular
traffic.....San Diego, California.
Visual
Screen. A physical obstruction used to separate two
areas or uses which is at least 75 percent opaque.
....North
Lauderdale, Florida.
Water
Harvesting: Any combination of
techniques that results in storm
or flood waters captured on site, for later plant use
or return to the water table.........
.................... Sparks, Nevada.
Waterfront
Yard. Property abutting open water, bays, bayous,
wetlands, lakes, canals, aquatic conservation or preservation
areas........Tampa, Florida.
___________________________________________________________
NOTES
.
4.
Bernhardt, E., Swiecki, T. J. 1991.
Guidelines for Developing And Evaluating Tree Ordinances. Prepared for:
Urban Forestry Program, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection,
Sacramento, CA. 76 p.
5.
IBED, Bernhardt, E, Swiecki,T.J.
8.
The large tree argument is advanced by the Center for Urban Forest
Research (Davis, CA), working with the Southern Center for Urban Forestry
Research & Information (Athens, GA) See the document at
http://www.urbanforestrysouth.org/Resources/Library/Citation.2004-04-13.0724/file_name/
Center for Urban Forest Research (Davis, CA),
Southern Center for Urban Forestry Research & Information (Athens, GA) 04/13/2004 USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station Davis, CA. 2004
9. Hoefer, P.J.,
Himelick, E.B., DeVoto, D.F., Municipal Tree Manual, Municipal Arborists
and Urban Foresters Society, International Society of Arboriculture, Urbana IL.
1990.
10. Charles Weber writing in Shading Our
Cities, Island Press, 1989 (Developing A Successful Urban Tree Ordinance makes
the argument that well written tree ordinances are often written by committees
who cut and paste from other community codes but he argues that that each code
should be unique and tailored to local conditions, a workable compromise with
de-regimented terminology. He makes no statement that the ordinance should be
part of community zoning.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A-
Exhibit B-
Exhibit C-
BACKGROUND
READING ON GREEN LAWS
Abbey, D.G. Buck, "Green Laws, Building Landscapes
In The Twenty-first century".
Proceedings 1999 ASLA Annual Meeting, American Society of Landscape
Architects, Washington D. C.. 1999.
Abbey, D.G. Buck, "Green Laws In Three
Communities". Proceedings 2003
National Urban Forest Conference, American Forest, Washington D. C.. 2003.
Abbey, D.G. Buck, "U.S. Landscape
Ordinances". John Wiley & Son,
Inc., New York, NY. 1998.
Abbey, D.G. Buck, "Guide To Writing A Landscape
Ordinance". Louisiana Association of Nurserymen, Baton Rouge, LA.
1988.
Abbey, D.G. Buck, "Guide To Writing A City Tree
Ordinance". Louisiana Association of Nurserymen, Baton Rouge, LA.
1993.
Bernhardt, E.A. and Swiecki, T.J., Guidelines for
Developing and Evaluating Tree Ordinances, California Department of Forestry
and Fire Protection Urban Forestry Program, Sacramento, CA. 1991.
Bowen, C., Landscape Ordinances: To Define and Protect,
Zoning Practice, American Planning Association, April 2004.
Fazio, James., How To Write A Municipal Tree Ordinance,
Bulletin No. 9. National Arbor Day Foundation, Nebraska City, Nebraska. 1991.
Garber, Melvin., Components of a Tree and Landscape Ordinance,
University of Georgia, November, 2000.
Duerksen, Christopher. J., Richman, Suzanne, Tree Conservation Ordinances, PAS Report
Number 446, American Planning
Association, Chicago, Il. 1993.
Duerksen, Christopher. Tree And Vegetation Conservation
Ordinance Annotated Outline, Citizens For A Scenic Florida,Jacksonville, FL.
2002.
Moll, Gary, Ebenreck, Sara., Shading Our Cities, Island
Press, Washington D.C., 1989.
Robinette, Gary, O. "Local Landscape
Ordinances." Agora Communications, Plano, Texas, 1992.
Wolfe, K.L., Trees, Parking and Green Law: Strategies
For Sustainability, College of Forest Resources,
University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 2004
__________________., International Zoning Code,
International Code Council Inc., Country Club Hills, IL, 2002.
__________________., Manual For Hurricane Resistant
Construction, Southern Building Code Congress International, Birmingham,
Alabama, 1993.
__________________., Standard Building Code, 1997
editon, Southern Building Code Congress International, Birmingham, Alabama,
1997.
Biography
D.G. Buck
Abbey is Associate Professor of Landscape Architecture at LSU and Principal of
the Louisiana, landscape architecture - planning firm, Abbey Associates, Inc.
He has taught design, construction, graphics and computer technology courses at
LSU since 1974. Abbey received his terminal degree from Harvard
University. He is a recognized authority
on municipal landscape codes and is author of the book U.S. Landscape Ordinances published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
in 1998. He provides consulting services
on landscape codes and site planning nationwide.
Abbey
maintains a research web site at LSU on the subject of landscape, tree and land
alteration ordinances. The site provides assistance to anyone seeking help with
writing landscape codes, tree preservation laws and land development code. The site can be visited at www.greenlaws.lsu.edu/ A CEU tutorial
on the subject of landscape ordinances
is available at by The Ohio State University, Regional Planning Department, the
Planning Education at a Distance web site program. Contact The Ohio State University at http://knowlton.osu.edu/ped/
________________ _____
____________
______________________________ ____
This
paper was presented to an assembly of members of the Florida Chapter of the
International Society of Arborists in Florida in January 2005. Research for this presentation and this
article have been made possible in part by grants from the USDA Forest Service, Urban and Community Forestry Program of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture
And Forestry , The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality and
Environmental Protection Agency, and the Florida Chapter of the International
Society of Arboriculture (ISA).